Timeline
of Efforts to Ban CCA
and Arsenic in Treated Wood Products
The Rise and Fall of CCA Treated Wood
|
Date
|
Event
|
|
1880s
|
Creosote
pressure-treated railroad ties first used in the United States.
|
|
1911
|
Copper
Napthenate first used
commercially as a wood preservative.
|
|
1926
|
Copper
Chromate (CC)
wood preservative
developed by the Celcure Company. |
|
1933
|
Chromated
Copper Arsenate (CCA)
is patented.
|
|
1933
|
CCA
Treated lumber is sold in Europe.
|
|
1938
|
CCA-A
(the first CCA formulation) is
introduced in the United States. |
|
1955
|
American
Wood Preservers Institute (AWPI), a wood
treatment industry group, |
|
1968
|
CCA-C,
the most widely-used formulation for Chromated Copper Arsenate,
is introduced. |
|
1968
|
First
report of a CCA-related worker injury occurred
at Koppers, when workers fell ill after breathing CCA sawdust.
|
|
1968
|
Drs.
Ferm and Carpenter publish study on birth defects caused by arsenic in
laboratory animals. (1)
|
|
1972
|
Dr.
Ronald Hood publishes additional studies on the teratogenic effects of
arsenic on fetal development in mice. (2)
|
|
Mid-1970s
|
Germany bans CCA treated wood. |
|
1978
|
EPA begins Special Review (RPAR) of CCA, due to concerns that CCA exceeded the EPA’s own risk criteria for fetotoxicity/teratogenicity (birth defects), oncogenicity (cancer) and mutagenicity (mutations). |
|
Mid-1980s
|
Demand
for CCA-treated lumber soars during the 5 year
period of 1983-1988. (9)
|
|
Mid-1980s
|
Reports
of CCA injuries begin to mount.
|
|
1983-1986
|
CCA injury case studies are published in medical journals, including The Journal for the American Medical Association. Scientists warn that: “working with CCA treated lumber with power equipment in an enclosed area appears to pose a very severe health hazard”, and that “vigorous measures [should] be taken to inform the lumber industry and the general public of the hazards of burning CCA treated wood...” (3) |
|
1985
|
At the request of the EPA, the treated wood industry agrees to develop consumer information sheets as part of a voluntary Consumer Awareness Program (CAP) with important safety information to provide to consumers (end users) of wood preserved with CCA, creosote, or pentacholorophenol (penta). These warning sheets were to contain steps to prevent potentially hazardous exposures to wood preservatives, and include handling, wood working, and disposal precautions. (4) |
|
1987
|
California Department of Health Services (DHS) issues report to the state legislature on the hazards posed by the use of wood preservatives in playground equipment. |
|
1988
|
EPA concludes its Special Review of CCA and issues a new registration standard for inorganic arsenicals, which imposes additional conditions on CCA’s usages, but no restrictions on its use in treated wood . CCA is now classified as a restricted use pesticide. In addition, arsenic and hexavalent chromium are now classified as “class A carcinogens”. The EPA acknowledges for the first time that both arsenic and chromium have the potential to cause teratogenic/fetotoxic effects. |
|
Late
1980s
|
Canadian research scientist, Dieter Riedel of Health Canada, conducts first research study into arsenic leached from playground equipment. He tested 10 CCA wood playground structures and found arsenic on all 10 structures and in the soil around them. His study was not published for a few more years. |
|
January
1990
|
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commisson (CPSC) begins its study called: “Project for Estimate of Risk of Skin Cancer from Dislodgeable Arsenic on Pressure Treated Wood Playground Equipment”. |
|
August
1990
|
U.S.
Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) publishes
flawed study results on the risk of skin cancer from arsenic on pressure
treated wood used in playground equipment. (4)
The CPSC issues recommendations that: 1) Treated wood manufacturers & playground equipment manufacturers develop procedures to reduce arsenic in treated wood products. 2) Wood preservers should increase availability of their consumer information sheets. 3) the exposure of consumers to arsenic during woodworking operations (sanding, sawing, etc.) should be reviewed. |
|
1992
|
Canadian
study by Drs. Doyle & Malaiyandi on CCA leaching
in soil samples and dislodging from playground equipment is published.
Study also focuses on reducing user exposure. (5)
|
|
1993
|
Sweden bans CCA lumber products. |
|
1993
|
U.S.
EPA bans use of arsenic acid (a pesticide containing
inorganic arsenic, which is also a component of CCA) for treating cotton
crops. (9)
|
|
1993
|
Australian
study published on environmental and occupational
health aspects of using CCA-treated wood for constructing boardwalks.
(6)
|
|
July
1994
|
New
Jersey becomes the first state to restrict
the use of CCA wood in marine applications. CCA is restricted in the construction
of new or rebuilt marine structures at marinas where shellfish are prominent.
(9)
|
|
1994
|
Demand
for CCA lumber soars again, as
housing starts rose by 13% in 1994. (9) |
|
1996
|
Toxic
arsenic levels detected in ash from wood co-generation
facilities around Florida stirs controversy.
|
|
1998
|
|
|
1998
|
Drs.
Stillwell and Gorny of the Connecticut Agricultural
Experimental Station publishes new study on soil contamination from CCA-treated
wood decks. (8)
|
|
1999
|
Minnesota
Listed Metals Advisory Council invites the
Florida CCA Research team to their proceedings on hexavalent chromium.
Committee debates whether to ban CCA-treated wood.
|
|
1999
|
Arsenic is discovered in the soil at a Gainesville, Florida area elementary school playground, spurring a big controversy. The playground is soon torn down and all contaminated soil is remediated. |
|
1999
|
Citizens
of Eastham, Massachusetts vote to use non-CCA
treated wood on new dock project due to environmental issues over CCA
wood.
|
|
2000
|
Osmose,
Inc., a treated wood preserver, publishes its
own study of soil contamination from CCA decks.
|
|
2000
|
Disney World chooses to use non-CCA treated wood in the construction of their Animal Kingdom theme park due to concerns about toxicity to zoo animals. |
|
2000
|
EPA
begins re-evaluating failed Consumer Awareness Program (CAP) where wood
industry volunteered to notify consumers of CCA wood hazards.
|
|
March
2001
|
St.
Petersburg Times releases Special Report:
“The Poison in your Back Yard”. Gainesville Sun follows suit with Special Report: “Wood Worries”. |
|
April
2001
|
Florida
DEP issues moratorium on purchase of CCA treated
wood for use in state parks. DEP also asks the Florida legislature for
funds to convert a state-owned wood treatment plant from CCA to ACQ.
|
|
April
2001
|
Senator
Bill Nelson petitions EPA Director Whitman
for new mandatory warning labels for CCA treated wood products.
|
|
May
2001
|
Rep.
Larry Crow of the Florida Legislature begins
failed attempt to get CCA wood banned in Florida.
|
|
May
2001
|
Environmental
groups petition U.S. Consumer Product Safety
Commission to ban the use of CCA wood for playground
equipment.
|
|
July
2001
|
Treated
wood industry agrees to new voluntary
warning labels on
CCA treated wood.
|
|
September
2001
|
Alachua
County, Florida votes to close 10 area playgrounds
and tear down their CCA playground structures, replacing them with plastic
and metal instead. County also bans all future CCA
|
|
October
2001
|
U.S.
Consumer Product Safety Commission and Canadian
government agencies review safety issues of CCA wood. Scientific advisory
panels meet to discuss CCA hazards & issues.
|
|
October
2001
|
Bush
administration and EPA adopt a more stringent
arsenic limit of 10 ppb for drinking water.
|
|
November
2001
|
Environmental
Working Group (EWG) publishes provocative report
about arsenic levels found in off-the-shelf CCA lumber sold at Lowes and
Home Depot retail stores.
|
|
December
2001
|
EPA
scientists from FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel
recommend
a “bio-monitoring” study of children exposed to CCA wood in playgrounds. |
|
January
2002
|
States, towns and villages across the U.S. rally to ban CCA from their parks and playgrounds, including the state of Massachusetts, cities of Denver and St. Louis, and even the tiny community of Healey, Alaska. |
|
February
2002
|
European Union considers banning CCA treated wood in its 15 member countries, including: Germany, Belgium, Luxembourg, France, Portugal, Spain, Italy, Greece, Austria, The United Kingdom, Ireland, Finland, Sweden, Denmark and The Netherlands. |
|
February
12 2002
|
The treated wood industry and the EPA agree to a 2 year voluntary phaseout of most CCA treated lumber products for residential use. The Phase-out is to conclude by December 31, 2003. No further sales of CCA lumber allowed for residential purposes in the U.S. after this date. |
|
March
2002
|
EWG
and other environmental groups petition EPA
to stop sales of arsenic-treated wood and shorten the phase-out period. |
|
April
6 2002
|
Canadian
wood treaters and Canadian government agencies
including Health Canada agree to voluntary
phase-out of CCA wood products, similar to
U.S. phaseout, ending by December, 2003.
|
|
May
2002
|
New
study data revealed at CCA Technical Advisory
Group meeting in Gainesville shows that aged CCA wood leaches a more potent
form of arsenic than previously thought.
In addition, toxic hexavalent chromium is shown to also leach from CCA wood under alkaline conditions. |
|
June
2002
|
New York State Legislature Passes CCA Ban |
|
Sept.
2002
|
Environmental
Working Group (EWG) report shows
high levels of arsenic leaching out of pressuretreated wood in older decks, playsets, and picnic tables. |
|
Dec. 2002
|
Injuries
from arsenic in CCA scrap found in landscaping mulch are reported.
|
|
Dec. 10,
2002
|
Environmental
group Beyond Pesticides, Communication Workers of America, BANCCA.ORG
and others join together to sue the EPA to ban all forms of toxic treated
wood, including creosote, pentachlorophenol and CCA treated wood.
|
|
Dec. 16,
2002
|
The
Kerr-McGee Corporation, the nation's largest creosote producer,
announced that it would be leaving the forest products business and closing
at least 4 of its 5 forest products plants immediately. |
|
Dec. 31,
2002
|
The
American Wood Preservatives Institute (AWPI), the national industry
trade association representing the pressure-treated wood industry, closes
its offices, laying off all of its employees.
|
|
Jan. 7,
2003 |
The
European Union (EU) announces its ban on arsenic in wood preservatives,
such as CCA, to take effect on June 30, 2004.
|
|
Feb. 7
, 2003
|
The
US Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) releases its long-awaited
report on the safety of CCA wood in playground equipment, which details
a possible 1-in-10,000 maximum risk of increased lung and bladder cancer.
|
|
Mar. 17,
2003 |
EPA
announces the finalization of the voluntary ban on residential
uses of CCA, to take effect on December 31, 2003. |
|
June 4,
2003
|
Maine
bans the sale of all CCA treated wood.
|
|
July 27, 2003 |
Class
action law suit filed against Home Depot
over CCA wood on behalf of all consumers in Texas. |
|
July
28, 2003
|
Australian
PVMA announces intent to
review all CCA treated wood for possible ban. |
|
Sept 03, 2003 |
Flagler
County, Florida enacts ban on CCA treated wood.
|
|
Oct. 15,
2003 |
US
Consumer Product Saftety Commission
rejects recall of CCA Treated wood in Playground Equipment. |
|
Nov. 13,
2003
|
EPA
releases results of Probabilistic Risk
Assessment on CCA treated wood in Playground Equipment. |
|
Dec.
24, 2003
|
Australian
PVMA releases draft report and
calls for a ban of CCA treated wood. |
|
Dec. 31, 2003 |
Last
day to legally manufacture CCA treated wood for
residential purposes in the United States. |
|
Jan. 1,
2004
|
EPA's
voluntary ban on manufacture of residential
CCA Treated wood products in the US takes effect. |
|
Jan. 30, 2004 |
Judge Denies
Right of Environmental Groups (Beyond Pesticides, et. al.) |
|
Feb. 8-11, 2004 |
International
Conference on the Environmental Impacts of |
|
Mar. 16, 2005 |
Australia's Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (PVMA) has ruled that CCA treated timber will be phased out for use in play equipment. |
Sources and references:
(1) Ferm, Carpenter. (1968), "Malformations Induced by Sodium Arsenate", Journal of Reproductive Fertility, Vol. 17.
(2) Hood, R., Bishop, S. (1972, Jan.), "The Teratogenic Effects of Sodium Arsenate in Mice", Archives of Environmental Health, Vol 24, pp. 62-65.
Hood, R. (1972), "Effects of Sodium Arsenite on Fetal Development", Bulletin of Environmental Contamination & Toxicology, Vol. 7 NO. 4, pp. 216-222.
Hood, R., et. al. (1978), "Prenatal Effects of Oral versus Intrapertoneal Sodium Arsenate in Mice", Journal of Environmental Pathology and Toxicology, Vol. 1., pp.857-864.
(3) Sources:Acta Pharmacologica et Toxicologica, Vol. 59, Supplement 7, pg. 39-43, 1986. Also: Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 251 (18) pgs. 2392-2396, 1984.
(4) U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, (1990), “Report for Project on Playground Equipment - Transmittal of Estimate of Risk of Skin Cancer from Dislodgeable Arsenic on Pressure Treated Wood Playground Equipment”.
(5) Doyle, E., and M. Malaiyandi. (1992). “Field study to investigate the leaching and dislodgeability of copper, chromium, and arsenic from CCA-C treated lumber and to evaluate means for reducing environmental contamination and user exposure”. Health and Welfare Canada, Ontario, Canada.
(6) Comfort, M. (1993), “Environmental and Occupational Health Aspects of Using CCA-Treated Timber for Walking Track Construction in Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area”. Scientific Rep. Jan, 1993, Hobart, Tasmania: Tasmanian Parks and Wildlife Service.
(7) Lebow, Stan. (1996) Leaching of Wood Preservative Components and Their Mobility in the Environment, Summary of Pertinent Literature“, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-93. 36 pgs.
(8) Stilwell, D.E., and K.D. Gorny. (1997). Contamination of soil with copper, chromium, and arsenic under decks built from pressure treated wood. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 58:22-29. Springer Verlag New York Inc.
(9) Edelstein, Daniel. “Arsenic”, U.S. Geological Survey Web site.
Home
Victim Accounts
Special Reports
Last Updated: February 10, 2004
© Copyright 2004 BANCCA.ORG, LLC
All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer: BANCCA.ORG makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information provided on its Web site. However the information presented is for research and educational purposes only, and is subject to regular review and change without notice. No warranty or representation can be provided regarding this information. We do not accept liability for any losses or damage arising directly or indirectly from reliance on the information in any article written or published on this Web site.Sponsored by Vivagen Health Products. See our Web site for Detoxamin EDTA chelation products.